that's "the story" on this friday, december 13. my daughter's birthday. we will see you back here monday night at 7:00 everybody, have a great weekend. musica♪ >> welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." as you figured out, i'm not tucker carlson but in filling in, he will be back soon. in a matter of days impeachment will be a reality, an open vote on the open for at the house. this morning the house judiciary committee approved two articles of impeachment against the president of the united states. >> the question now is on article one of the resolution, impeaching donal donald j. trumr abuse of powers. >> mr. chairman there are 23 aye and seven no. >> the question is on article

two of the resolution, impeaching donald j. trump for obstructing congress. the clerk will call the role. >> mr. chairman there are 23 ayes and 17 no. >> without objection, the committee is adjourned. >> immediately democrats in the media proclaimed at the saddest day in american history as if they haven't been seeking impeachment for three years. >> these proceedings have been conducted in a solemn, fair, dignified manner. >> could tell from the looks on all of their faces that this is a moment in history that none of them really wanted. >> the chairman with remind us of the salinity of the moments. >> the art taking this serious seriously. you feel the weight of the president and the weight of the past. >> today is a solemn and sad

day. >> mr. chairman, there are 23 aye and seven no. >> of the resolution to. >> that's the second time i've seen it and it's still remarkable. >> is mind-blowing. >> not that solemn anymore. cedric richmond didn't get the memo either come this week he was spotted catching up on a golf tournament on his laptop instead of paying attention to the proceedings. former dnc chairwoman debbie wasserman schultz is meanwhile more angry than sad. >> we are here because the president of the united states has treated the constitution like toilet paper. like nothing more than toilet paper. >> all right. what about the mastermind behind all of this? what about adam schiff? how is he being static? he gave a speech worthy of an

oscar. >> i wonder how they are going to explain one day when a grandchild comes to them and says, that man that was putting people in cages, dividing our country, extorting our allies, please tell me what you did to stand up to that man. what will their answer be? for all to many, there will be nothing. there will be nothing except shame. >> wright, the people in cages, shall we just outline it? i also think it's important to say that, that man who added 266 jobs last month is working on a series of free trade agreements as you put it to catapult economy to another generation it's doing its best to keep us out of wars. but a lot of kids don't want to talk about sports, they want to talk about international affairs. probably rehearse that one or two times in a mirror, they

treated all this the same way they treated the russian investigation. >> president trump: so the impeachment is a hoax, it's a sham, it started a long time ago. probably before i came down the escalator with the future first lady, started a long time ago. so we are dealing with a lot of corrupt people. there was nothing done wrong. to use the power of impeachment on this nonsense, it's an embarrassment to this country. >> abuse of power, obstruction of congress. those are the two articles that will be on the floor on wednesday. you know longer have to sit and that's seat and stared straight ahead. yowhat do you think the real feeling among democrats is? >> we will note the real feeling next november when the american people get to decide that the

whole thing was ridiculous. this was about what nancy pelosi said three and a half weeks ago when she called the president of the united states and imposter. they've never accepted at 63 million of us voted for this guy to come to this town and drain the swamp, one in an electoral college landslide. they've been looking for anyway and every way to take him out of this town and take them out of office and now it comes down to impeachment. when all the facts are on the president tsai to come up they don't care because they've never accepted the will of the american people. >> how would you characterize what you went through? i saw a group of people talking at each other, not to each other, they did not engage each other so nothing was done. i felt as though the american people were or to tears or hit mute, no offense. >> i get that but again, they want except the facts. four facts have never changed, they will never change. there was no quid pro quo on the transcript. the two guys on the call, president trump and president zelensky. they both said no linkage, we

have the fact that ukraine didn't even know -- and most portly ukraine took no action. those facts have always been there, but they don't care. they've never accepted the will of the people and that, they know they can't be president trump next november. in 2016 they had the insurance policy. in 2020 they are trying impeachment and president trump will win because of his amazing record. >> they don't really talk to each other and certainly not to adam schiff, i will try to be the go-between. what are you going to say to your grandchildren when they ask you, why did you do anything to stop that horrible man? >> we defended th the dash tax , economy going at an unbelievable

pace, you just had some of the numbers from last month. hostages home from north korea and today marks one of the greatest trade days for our country. the president said he's going to work with boris johnson to get a new agreement with great britain. those are the kind of things he's getting done and that's what he will win next november. >> we are also getting a space for us. lastly really quick congressman jordan, when you look at this whole thing in its entirety and you look at brexit, brexit gets past and they don't accept it, nothing happens. president trump ones on the election and they don't accept it, they fight the whole time. do you see a parallel? >> certainly. when you have people coming on and taking the establishment, trying to drain the swamp and standing up for the american people, the hardworking folks where, i know in ohio, families across this country, that makes this town go crazy. this president is fighting for

the very people he told them he was going to fight for, doing what he said he was going to do. >> i can tell your wrestler because you just worked for 36 out of the last 48 hours and you don't even look tired. thanks for spending part of our friday night with us. meanwhile, straight ahead. after impeachment it will be mitch mcconnell's job to oversee a trial in the senate. mcconnell has to recuse recuse himself because he could not take an oath to be impartial. congressman mike johnson represents louisiana. how many people knew about the congressman from louisiana before the series of national hearings but we know you now. what's your reaction to the new push to get mitch mcconnell to recuse himself? he says he's going to go to the white house to find out what they want to do with this trial. >> i think it's absurd. mitch mcconnell made a couple of comments in the last 24 hours acknowledging the very obvious truth about all this, that everybody in the country now has seen the record. they've seen the facts and

they've seen what supposedly is backing up these articles of impeachment and there's nothing there. professor turley said it so well, the only expert we've been allowed on the republican side in this whole charade, he said it's the thinnest record in the history of impeachment, on the weakest charges. there's nothing there. we systematically destroyed their case, 14 hours of that hearing and everybody can see it and mitch mcconnell can as well. >> two schools of thought. i do talk radio as well come everybody on talk radio that sees the side with the president wants to see a trial. and the ukraine, that might have been something else going on. while russia was also up to no good in 2016. are you someone that believes to radically tell the whole story you should try to prove the thesis them president had a question mark >> i was with the

president this evening and he wants a side of the case to be put out there and i do too. many of us, his supporters and those who believe in the rule of law, he's been railroaded. he did not get due process and he should have a right to get his witnesses and the other side of the story out there. i also understand the rationale of getting this through the senate quickly. there is an alternative here, we could look into what still remains out here about ukraine and the scandals and unanswered questions that could be done in a simple investigation to the senate judiciary committee. we might be able to avoid a full trial in the senate but i think everybody knows now that the case is so weak and it will go away and be dispensed with pretty quickly. >> so what was the president's attitude like? >> the president is in a very good mood today because he sees what's happening. we will look back on the democrats because we all warned them and told them and expected that the polling would move in the direction of the president. he's up a measurable amount in

the lot of the swing states and these democrats that are elected in the swing states are in big trouble. there will be a big political price to be paid. at the end of the day as we said in our closing, it's not just a political price, just a political price the democrats are having to pay. there's a price that the country pays for this charade because they've open a pandora box. a single party impeachment is something that the founders of this country warned against because he knew it would divide us. >> it never had a come before 23 of 17 of the committee. how many democrats will vote for for the impeachment? >> we are hearing it there's a handful, maybe ten or a dozen. a lot of them went home from the weekend and they will hear it from their constituents. these 31 that are from the swing districts that trump one or in some real jeopardy right now. they better think long and hard about it. >> it will be interesting because we are in an election year and a lot of those men and women got in a year ago promising to get something done. i don't know if this is what the

constituents had in mind. congressman johnson, go enjoy your weekend. meanwhile, here we go. final preparations for impeachment vote will be held at the house rules committee. that's why i queued up debbie lesko again. she sits on that committee as well as the committee that saw all that chicanery this last week. you must have a lot of vibrant or red bull because you are going back at it tuesday to set up the rules to vote for impeachment of wednesday. right? >> i sure am, i am working hard. we will be in roof committee and i can repeat all the things that i already said in judiciary committee again and then i will be on the floor of the house of representatives while we are managing overall debating of the articles of impeachment. what a great opportunity it is, part of history for me to be there at this particular time fighting for what i believe is

right which is opposing these articles of impeachment. >> in the rules committee, is it just a formality or what rules are they coming up with? we are voting on how long to debate this, that's probably what the rules will be and how long the debate will go on on the floor. of course we are going to, and the rules committee is the only committee that meets in the u.s. capitol. it's on the third floor of the u.s. capitol. it is open to the public, so public can attend and it's broadcast i believe lives. but we basically debate the rules. there's only four republicans on the committee, 29 democrats so we are always outvoted. they will win, they will get whatever they want and whatever rules they want that will govern how the debate goes on the flo floor. >> interesting. we know there is a little feud

that you are having with the legendary singer actress bette midler. she is very into politics and yesterday she tweeted at you. now this gal, meaning you will come up debbie lesko come is grandstanding. blame the dems and don't blame the criminal in the white house. his own actions and his own words. maybe richard nixon was not a you crook but this guy really is. but you didn't sit on the side and say, i love her work and i better not get involved. but you got involved. you said hey gal, it looks like the wind beneath your wings has turned into hot air. democrats just acting like ruthless people. congress person you are served, what has happened today? >> she hasn't taken the bait again for me, and i was just having some fun. i've had all these people calling my office and commenting on my tweets.

there are some nasty people come democrats saying nasty things. i totally disagree with her, but i thought i would poke her back and have some fun with it. >> you did. lastly in the big picture, it brought up something interesti interesting. there are things on the tape that were problematic. bill clinton apologized for his acts and did lie oath. >> as i said repeatedly there are no crimes that democrats can prove. none of the fact witnesses were able to establish any bribery, treason, high crimes or misdemeanors. president trump has not committed any of this, there has been no evidence. and there are democrats that are

grasping here, and as soon as they got the power and the majority of the u.s. house of representatives, they were bound and determined to impeach as president of the united states. >> the speaker said two days a ago, and lastly, if they don't get his taxes, there is an inquirer deal. is this going to impeach? >> it looks like it because that's what representative al green said. he said, we can impeach him again so when the senate throws it out -- who knows. you know, i like some of my democratic colleagues. i work with them. but i really do not understand them, it's like they are obsessed. they just cannot stand and they think that's impeachable. just because they don't like a

guy doesn't mean they should impeach them. >> after the week you've had to come up that's amazing. congresswoman, thanks so much. meanwhile we have this straight ahead. we will discuss key, you heard me, a key parts of the ig report that everyone has been ignoring. and a little bit later, a final exam. the big story yesterday, it got bumped because of impeachment hearings. last night we took it and today you will see it. ainsley and janice dean had to head for the first time we know of, unless they did something before or after. ♪

>> the house has moved quickly through the impeachment process but some think the senate trial could be even briefer if that's possible. they can't tell us if it will be a long trial or short one. >> president trump: i didn't do anything wrong so i could do long or short. i've heard mitch and lindsay, i think they are in agreement on some concepts so i will do whatever it takes. >> the president may be indifferent today but not yesterday but in strategic terms, what's a better approach if you're the white house? janet ellis is a attorney. what is the best tactic we would like to see implanted by the senate by the white house for the president? >> either way he's going to win. what the american people need to understand is impeachment does not mean president trump is guilty of anything. this is like, in a regular

criminal setting, if a prosecutor was filing charges, that doesn't mean that they aren't necessarily filing them maliciously. unfortunately sometimes this does occur and hear the houses filing malicious articles of impeachment as a malicious prosecution against president trump. so if this is a summary judgment that the senate kicks us out saying there is no legal or constitutional basis, that's actually proper. it's not a rigged jury, but is proper under constitution and rule of law. if we go fully to a full trial then there's evidence and witnesses and the american people will see what they have seen for the past two and a half months and actually the past two years. this has just been an impeachment inquiry before he even took his oath of office. >> so when mitch mcconnell told sean hannity last night i'm going to go to the white house to see what they want to do, he's got to recuse himself. he's got to come up with his own investigation, not asking the

white house how they should be investigating. do the critics have a point? >> not at all. the trial in terms of the process is constitutionally up to the senate and this is different than a traditional judicial forum. this is what we would call a quasijudicial forum. so for mitch mcconnell that doesn't mean that he somehow jury rigging this whole thing, it just simply means what is the process going to be and how does this look for these types of articles of impeachment, because we know the abuse of power and obstruction of congress, there is no legal or constitutional basis for either of these charges and so all that the democrats are doing is putting this forth against president trump because they are ignoring the separation of powers and ignoring the legitimate vested powers in the executive branch the president trump has for foreign policy to set that. not abusing the power, simply disagreeing with the policy. for obstruction of justice he's allowed to go to the judicial branch and say, do i have to comply with these subpoenas are

not? congress especially democrats are not the tyrants and overlords of congress who can tell the president what he can and can't do. >> there's a lot of people that want the president on the offensive. i am curious about what the obama administration might have been doing for hillary clinton with the ukraine. i do think they played a role and i want to justify my phone call there. what they look to push everything aside or will they look to prove there's a premise for the conversation and for the skepticism? >> the president doesn't have to prove anything. >> what does he want to? >> i think is been very clear about whether or not he does that in the context of the senate trial or whether he continues to say this to the american people or whether there is a senate judiciary investigation because the republicans actually care about truth and fact and what actually happens. there are multiple ways the truth can come out, it doesn't have to be in the context of the senate trial and the impeachment scam. either way the truth will come

out. >> tuesday the rules, wednesday the house vote. we go to new year's and come back on the senate takes over, it looks like it will be quick. meanwhile impeachment isn't the only big story of the week. this is the biggest story in my mind, the ig report came out. but the press clearly wants you to ignore some of its findings. buck sexton, a clos close a hosf the buck sexton show. this is a big story and you as an analyst and the cia, i'm very curious to your reaction even when you read the summary of what michael horowitz came up with. >> it's appalling. we've always been told that pfizer was only going to be used for the most explicit and national security purposes and what you see here is that the fbi had people working on the highest profile political case ever, really, you could argue. they made mistake after mistake and i think even calling the mistake gives a little too much credit insert directions here because they made decisions

including one decision to falsify evidence entirely. they all went in the same direction and they were handpicked by mccabe who we know is anti-trump and obviously has been referred for firing mike lying under oath and fired from the fbi. when you look at the totality of the circumstances of all the ig said was we haven't found proof of bias against trump that we've been lectured a lot about circumstantial evidence. there's a lot of circumstantial evidence of bias against the presidential campaign and the fbi. >> when your best explanation to save himself his incompetence, you are usually not in a good place. you are so incompetent during the investigation you assumed that george papadopoulos and carter page play a dominant role to i guess throw the election. keep in mind to come up to me pedestrian, eat they had to be targeting the president. and, what kind of logic gets

into your mind? >> they were using what should be assistance of the campaign to avoid foreign penetration and national security threats to try to probe and get more derogatory information. that just shows there was a mind-set bias, they've already given and statements a not so fasfast and the attorney general barr is looking right now. i need someone to explain why a very senior fbi agent on the most sensitive case the fbi has ever handled would fabricate evidence to make carter page look worse, to continue a fisa application risking his career, and his reputation and possibly his freedom. that has to be biased. >> if you have youtube come go look up lindsey graham's opening statements to start this whole thing, using the tweets and the action to see the bias against him. this is what hardens me.

democrats should not be upset. they should not be a republican issue. when i read the rolling stone and the rolling stone exonerates devin nunes and says he's 100% right and vilifies adam schiff to say he is 100% wrong, that's known as a left-wing magazine. but the truth is the truth. >> the truth is the left is upset to find beyond any reasonable doubt that the president did not do anything wrong. no sane person can really make that case about russia collusion and also there are a lot of people in the media that have much to account for. you see what was said to specifically about the dossier which was not credible on its face and they didn't release it. but then when it was useful, they pretended it was credible and then they say hold on a second, this is utterly absurd. i hope we have a lot of people that forget what their role was in this whole conspiracy. >> if i was going to make a required reading assignment, if you take the executive summary is about 19 pages and read it this weekend.

i think you would feel as exercised as most americans that have taken the time to see what took place in 2016. >> absolutely. so for about 10 minutes, people judge the darling of the left and now they are turning on him just like they turned on beta or work. story, next.

>> the left is pulling in along with pete buttigieg. the mayor of south bend it does not have much black support and you know that. activists are disrupting the food a judgpete buttigieg eventg the one in south bend, remember? >> why are we talking about pete buttigieg? >> meanwhile other critics say he is too friendly with wall street. some past donors that want their money back and others are harassing him as he disses campaigns. [sh[chanting] >> because he worked for mckenzie, and he recorded a talk show host and author of what really happened, he joins us now.

how way, where they turning on pete? what's going on here? >> things move fast in the modern democratic party. one month you are the revolutionary and the next month you are counterrevolutionary. he was the flavor of the month but unfortunately for mayor pete, the month was november and it's now december. you know another problem he's got now in the woke democratic party is that they have these pictures of him, these devastating photos of him, the last four christmas seasons. he's in front of a red kettle and he's ringing a bell. >> salvation army. >> they are going crazy about that, certain elements of the democrat party. this is what happens. one day you are at the top of the heap when you are in the revolution. you know like robespierre and the french revolution. he led to the guillotine and a year and a half later they are topping off his head. now is happening to mayor pete.

>> battling on a daily basis. imagine that, making money in america with the profession. i can imagine it. i want you to hear what elizabeth warren just got in terms of endorsement. >> hello? >> hello, megan? >> i would much rather be on your team and help you in any way that i can. >> i think we got this. >> we have a little saying -- >> all right megan megan, you and me. >> sowell fg. i guess make an always on board. >> brian, when i heard that i had to think for a moment to remember who megan was.

her 15 minutes have long since expired i think. she got the award as the sports woman of the year for "sports illustrated," and "sports illustrated" is down to monthly. i think the way things are going, who do you think is the front runner right now? i think it's bernie sanders again. he's back up at the top i think. >> first, someone will give you an abbreviation, if you don't know what it is, don't repeat it. that's not something she should be repeating. megan repeat noah someone who was cursing like a sailor and a bunch of 10-year-old girls who wanted to worship the world cup stars so i wonder about her judgment and the big picture. if i'm a democrat, i don't know who's up top. right now, people are going back to joe biden it seems because i know what to expect and, they'd know what to expect with everyone else. bloomberg seems to be making more sense every day and he's willing to spend to do it. but you are still thinking it's bernie sanders right now?

>> they are all trying to go further to the left. he honeymooned in the soviet union, took off his shirt and saying the woody guthrie's songs and it's hard to get to the left of bernie. bernie has been bragging, pete buttigieg and warren have been going back and forth. bernie says, i never worked for a corporation. you know, he excoriates the billionaires with a little more enthusiasm than either mayor pete or the fake indian so i given the edge right now. >> and by the way it's not his fault he made money off his books. he's a millionaire and a socialist. it's he just can't have any money. thanks so much. and you are free to make money and be a good person. >> i agree. >> meanwhile it's like a horror movie. a family security camera was

hacked and used to harass their 8-year-old daughter. that story is a head end it's all too real. but first, it's time for final exam. see if you can out with the experts right here at fox news. ♪ it means "cyanara," honor roll. (imitates shell fire, laughs) the ink! daaaad! daaaad! i'm so hosed. yeah. you are. (shaq) the epson ecotank printer. no more cartridges! it comes with an incredible amount of ink that can save you a lot of trips to the store. get ready for the dean's list. who's dean? the epson ecotank. just fill and chill. available at...

♪ guess what, it's time for "the final exam" where our fox exports complete the show with their mastery and strange obscure news knowledge. this week's contestant goes by the name of ainsley earhardt. she's a fox & friends cohost and author of this book. ainsley, make yourself feel happy, if you do say so yourself. she will be taking on her colleague and a senior meteorologist, "mostly sunny"

author janice team. most of the time they are friends but now it's all about winning. >> its fox & friends at night. >> right. >> but he loved at the morning so much, he embraced the hour. let's start with question number one. >> didn't normally answer is yes. let me finish all the choices. if you get it right you get a point but if you get it wrong you lose a point. red girl, blue girl, woman, woman. let's play, best-of-five winds and will begin with this question. multiple choice. which fast food chain is now selling fire logs which will make your entire house smell like their food? chick-fil-a, arby's, kfc. janice dean. >> kfc. >> is kfc right?

roland. >> kfc is bringing back its chicken scented fire logs. it's a limited edition but not as limited as your love life if you buy one. >> [laughs] that's a great line by kennedy and a great win by janice dean. quick check of the scores, 1-0 janice. we begin with number two. which 2020 candidate fell for an internet hoax that this weekend mistakenly believed that president trump had pardoned charles manson. >> is there a sound bite? is this multiple-choice? the lady with the brown hair that's pretty, what's her name? >> janice. >> marianne williamson. >> yes. >> i told you. because she got slammed on social media after falling for a fake news story claiming president trump pardoned charles

mansion. for the long shot, there was something deeply sinister about pardoning charles manson even posthumously. >> 2-0 janice. >> i gave her the hint. and we go back to multiple choice. residents say these animals are running rampant and destroying the neighborhood. what kind of animals are to blame. iguanas, groundhogs, or feral pigs? >> i think it's groundhogs. >> let's go to the tape. >> some call it an invasion, or infestation. >> what is that? >> those are iguanas. >> i lost a point i don't even have. >> wait, does she lose the point? >> look at that iguana, that's crazy. >> ainsley is minus one.

>> remember when she said in the beginning, on the weather girl? >> i didn't pick the groundhog. >> so it's two, to minus one. question number four, this is not multiple-choice. a piece of art featuring a banana taped to the wall recently sold in miami for $120,000. days later, a man walked up to the artwork and destroyed it. what happened to the banana? ainsley, you broke the rules again, go to janice. bickel what happened? >> i didn't do that earlier. >> okay, what happened to the banana? >> he ate the banana. did you know that? >> we told you about the banana duct taped to the wall, that artwork sold for an extende astg $120,000. but then someone got heart, congreve and a performance

artist ate the banana. >> juan williams is outraged and janice dean is now at three, to minus one. >> i want to tape one of these to the wall and sell it for the same price. >> they did that with a chicken sandwich. >> final question. these are worth -- this is worth 20 points. >> what? >> no it's not. u.k. prime minister boris johnson was seen riding a bulldozer through a styrofoam wall which had a big word written across it, what word was eight? was it socialism, gridlock, or malarkey? ainsley. >> gridlock. >> he needs a coma. >> of course yesterday he got onto a bulldozer and bulldozed

his way through a fake brick wall saying, yes. i can also break the gridlock in parliament. >> congratulations ainsley, you are now at zero. but you got one right. >> what is all this? >> that means ainsley, sadly you came in second. and janice, you one. >> i still think -- i get marianne. the lady with the brown hair. >> can you just not give me that one? >> no not yet. thanks so much for coming in. >> janice dean, i will see you in a couple of hours. >> are you going to stay in the city tonight? >> well, that -- that's all the time we have. tune in thursday so you can beat

the experts and have that pride and put your chest out. let's take a wide shot, and these two can apologize for yelling at me the entire game. ♪

♪ >> he sees you when you're sleeping, he knows when you're awake. i'm not talking santa claus. i'm talking about a terrifying story. the terrifying story that

happened in real life. mom installed a ring camera in her house but the camera got hacked in disturbing fashion. >> what is that? >> i'm your best friend. i'm santa claus. >> mommy! >> i'm santa claus! don't you want to be my best friend? >> that mom earlier today. >> she is still just really scared, she said that, she won't sleep in her bedroom. >> does the hacker know where you live? >> yes, when you log into the ring app it has your address right there. it shows a live stream account. >> an attorney and cyber security expert joins us now. you were watching, and you say this is not rare.

this happens a lot. >> would have been since these cameras have come into existence. hackers have been breaking and since 2016 and well into the present. speak up because they are using wi-fi. >> and the problem is the wi-fi password you have a home, and the password for the camera, they are not strong enough security. >> so now you need that password on top of the password. not only rotate that password out but come up with another one. >> unfortunately you haven't come up with another security. there is mixture of different characters you can use it but at this point you can also add authentication, including the ring camera which is part of this terrifying hack. they will send a code to your cell phone when someone attempts to login. >> what responsibility do the ring devices have? they said, the family more than likely has a weak account of security and there's nothing the company can do about it. >> this camera is an example of

the internet of things, which are devices that are said to the internet to function. like your smartwatch, smart refrigerator, and smart cameras. the problem is there is no regulation in the u.s. behind the privacy for these mechanisms. amazon really had no liability. they can say, change the default password. but they don't have to. >> if you are a parent watching that, what do you do? sometimes, as we know, the kid is told to keep quiet, don't say anything or your parents will get hurt. >> you definitely want to talk to your children about what they are saying. let them know signs that the camera might be t behaving badl. if the light is blinking when it shouldn't be, those are all signs to look for. if you need to have this device in your home, change the password, make it smarter. all those things because hackers are selling software for brute force access for $6 online. >> they are doing this it cheaply. is that person in danger of getting caught? >> on hacker forms now where

they are discussing all the hacks to break into different live stream cameras, they are very worried. hackers are concerned because it has become a major mainstream news issue. but tracking them down would be extremely complicated. if they are good, they're going to used anonymized software and hide their tracks, so that is the problem. >> it is a scary situation and the fact that it is not rare makes it twice as scary. take the time to get the protective password. don't expect a salesperson to do it. thank you, have a good weekend. thank you so much for tuning in tonight and each night at 8:00 eastern time. remember, this is the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. don't forget to dvr the show and if you don't tell people you do, watch a back even if you watch it live and make sure to check out my book. i will be doing live events this weekend, be in woodlands outside texas and lawrenceville, georgia, right after. go to brian kilmeade website and i can personalize the book at

the bookstore appeared on january 25th we do a fox nation shoot. america, great from the start. get your ticket at westbury new york. everything starts at 8:00. thank you for watching, everyone. watch a talker every single day he is counting on you. ♪ >> sean: hi, welcome to "hannity." we cap off a busy night. what a disaster tonight has been for the democrats, the deep state, the mob and the media. tonight we have a lot of breaking news. netty jerry nadler's, his own impeachment circus is chugging right along after her idiotic, b.s. hearings. most americans want it to stop, they see it for what it is, poll numbers for this which trial are tanking. here's something i think is the biggest barometer, ratings for fake news cnn, area 51, roswell rachel